Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dalila Jakupovic vs Tamara Kostic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jakupovic vs Kostic analysis and find out who is favored!
Dalila Jakupovic vs Tamara Kostic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jakupovic 0 - 0 Kostic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jakupovic has won 46.68% of points on his second serve, while Kostic has won 44.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jakupovic, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kostic has won 53.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.15% and 41.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jakupovic has saved 56.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kostic has saved 55.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jakupovic has won 55.42% of matches played (W/L 46/ 37), with Kostic winning 62.26% (W/L 33/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jakupovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 176/ 146), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 34/ 37). Kostic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 37/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 11/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Jakupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.15% of matches (W/L 42/ 29), where as Kostic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 16/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jakupovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.63 while Kostic has played against players with an average rank of 243.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jakupovic has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kostic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jakupovic has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kostic has converted 50.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
219
Rank
69
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
583
Rank
583
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
53% (462-413)
Career Total W/L
61% (59-37)
64% (28-16)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$220,920
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dalila Jakupovic | Tamara Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (28/16) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (63/42) | 55% (27/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (514/442) | 50% (224/224) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (20/7) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.58 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 127 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:43 | 1:40:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 323.86 | 292.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (2027/2976) | 62% (940/1526) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (1229/2027) | 60% (564/940) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (443/949) | 44% (260/586) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (185/373) | 51% (87/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1409/3015) | 46% (645/1391) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (27/13) | 70% (7/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (27/43) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (10/18) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (30/25) | 100% (11/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (30/5) | 0% (11/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 10% (10/1) |
Dalila Jakupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kaylah Mcphee
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Irina Maria Bara
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Maria Sara Popa
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
0-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
70%
(
76 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Kostic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Tamara Kostic
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Tamara Kostic
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
12
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Tamara Kostic
45%
(
42 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Valentina Ryser
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Jessica Failla
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Carmen Lopez Martinez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakupovic Vs Kostic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tamara Kostic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
